Personhood without substrate essentialism
What facts should matter when law recognises a Person whose embodiment, cognition or continuity may be distributed across biological and technical systems?
Research
Lex-Cybernetica treats future law as a research problem spanning doctrine, philosophy, technology, medicine, governance and social institutions.
What facts should matter when law recognises a Person whose embodiment, cognition or continuity may be distributed across biological and technical systems?
When does restoration preserve identity, when does replication create another Person, and when does a successor relationship arise?
How should law distinguish ownership of components and intellectual property from impermissible ownership or domination of a recognised Person?
Which courts, registries, review bodies, evidentiary processes and technical experts can make future-law decisions contestable and explainable?
How should law respond when Essential Functions depend on remote providers, networks, permissions, subscriptions or infrastructure?
How should identity, Personhood and continuity claims travel across jurisdictions without creating legal voids or duplication?
Research method
Version 3.0 preserves provenance and separates research evidence from Canon. Scenario work may expose weaknesses, but no outside comment, AI review or fictional outcome changes the framework automatically.
The Founder-Frozen Publication Edition remains fixed. Later substantive change requires a separately controlled amendment or successor edition.